Sightsavers Logo
Research centre
  • Home
  • About us
  • Research approach
  • Research studies and publications
  • Evidence gap maps
Join in:
  • Join in: Facebook
  • Join in: Twitter
  • Join in: Instagram
  • Join in: LinkedIn
  • Join in: YouTube
  • Global
  • Close search bar
    Donate
    • Home
    • About us
    • Research approach
    • Research studies and publications
    • Evidence gap maps

    Review of effects of anti-VEGF treatment on refractive error

    Methodological quality of the review: Low confidence

    Author: Helen A Mintz-Hittner, Megan M Geloneck

    Region: Taiwan, Mexico, Germany, USA, Egypt, Canada, Brazil

    Sector: Refractive error

    Subsector: Anti-VEGF treatment on refractive error

    Equity focus: No

    Study population: General population

    Type of programme: Hospital based

    Review type: Other review

    Quantitative synthesis method: Systematic review

    Qualitative synthesis method: Not applicable

    Background: Advances in treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are allowing better anatomical and functional outcomes, with further prevention of blindness from retinal detachment. Perhaps the most recent addition to the ROP-treatment armamentarium are anti-VEGF agents. Anti-VEGF agents have considerable clinical benefits, including reduction in the rate of high and very high myopia following treatment, compared with peripheral ablation.

    Authors concluded that anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP leads to low levels of myopia, and there may be a differential effect of specific anti-VEGF agents utilised on refractive outcomes.

    Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the contributions of these causative factors to the resulting refractive error seen in children treated by anti-VEGF agents for ROP.

    Main findings: Eleven articles were identified relevant to the topic. In total, this amounted to 466 eyes (the number of infants was not consistently reported) treated with anti-VEGF agents for ROP: 378 eyes with intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy (dosage ranging from 0.375 to 1.25 mg, with the majority administered 0.625 mg), 31 eyes with intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy (0.25 mg), and 26 eyes with intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy (1 mg). The average SE refractive error reported after anti-VEGF monotherapy ranged from +0.75 D to -3.57 D. The average age at time of refraction in these studies ranged from 11.4 months to 5 years.

    Methodology: A PubMed search was performed of several combinations of the following search terms: retinopathy of prematurity, ROP, refraction, refractive error, myopia, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, pegaptanib, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-VEGF. The last search update was performed on 13 January 2016. The reference list of each identified article was also reviewed to ensure completeness. Extracted information from each relevant article included the first author’s name, year of publication, country in which the study was conducted, average gestational age of each cohort, average birth weight of each cohort, percentage of eyes treated for zone I ROP, specific treatment modalities utilised, average adjusted age (gestational age + number of weeks of life) at time of treatment, average age at time of refraction, average spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error in diopters, prevalence of myopia (SE .-0.25 D), and prevalence of high myopia (SE .-5 D).

    Applicability/external validity: Not discussed.

    Geographic focus: This review was conducted in seven countries: Taiwan, Mexico, Germany, USA, Egypt, Canada and Brazil, As this is a drug showing benefits in myopia treatment, the results of this review may be applied to other countries.

    Summary of quality assessment:

    Overall, there is low confidence in the conclusions about the effects of this review, as important limitations were identified. Authors did not conduct a thorough search of the literature to ensure that all relevant studies were included in the review (potential publication bias). In addition, authors did not use rigorous methods to scree studies for inclusion, data extraction and assessing the methodological quality of included studies.

    Publication Source:

    Suhr Thykjær, A, Lundberg K, Grauslund J. Physical activity in relation to development and progression of myopia – a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmologica, 2017: 95(7), 651-659.

    source

    Sightsavers Logo
    Research centre
    • Join in:
    • Join in: Facebook
    • Join in: X
    • Join in: Instagram
    • Join in: LinkedIn
    • Join in: YouTube

    Protecting sight, fighting disease and promoting equality for all

  • Accessibility
  • Sightsavers homepage
  • Our policies
  • Media centre
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Cookies and privacy Terms and conditions Modern slavery statement Safeguarding

    © 2025 by Sightsavers, Inc., Business Address for all correspondence: One Boston Place, Suite 2600, Boston, MA 02108.

    Our website uses cookies

    To make sure you have a great experience on our site, we’d like your consent to use cookies. These will collect anonymous statistics to personalise your experience.

    Manage preferences

    You have the option to enable non-essential cookies, which will help us enhance your experience and improve our website.

    Essential cookiesAlways on

    These enable our site to work correctly, for example by storing page settings. You can disable these by changing your browser settings, but some parts of our website will not work as expected.

    Analytics cookies

    To improve our website, we’d like to collect anonymous data about how you use the site, such as which pages you read, the device you’re using, and whether your visit includes a donation. This is completely anonymous, and is never used to profile individual visitors.

    Advertising cookies

    To raise awareness about our work, we’d like to show you Sightsavers adverts as you browse the web. By accepting these cookies, our advertising partners may use anonymous information to show you our adverts on other websites you visit. If you do not enable advertising cookies, you will still see adverts on other websites, but they may be less relevant to you. For info, see the Google Ads privacy policy.