Author: Mhango PP, Zungu TL, Nkume HI, Musopole A, Mdala SY.
Geographical coverage: Kenya, Tanzania, The Gambia, Nigeria, Zambia, South Africa and Ethiopia.
Sector: Cataract surgery
Sub-sector: Visual outcomes
Equity focus: Not reported
Study population: Children with cataract
Review type: Effectiveness review
Quantitative synthesis method: Meta-analysis
Qualitative synthesis method: Not applicable
Background:
Paediatric cataract is a leading cause of childhood blindness in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). With declining corneal blindness owing to immunisation programmes and vitamin A supplementation, cataract now accounts for a greater proportion of visual loss in children. Prompt surgery is vital to prevent amblyopia, yet optimal practice—especially the timing of intra-ocular lens (IOL) implantation in infants—remains debated. Post-operative refractive correction (spectacles or contact lenses) and amblyopia therapy (e.g. patching) are also critical but inconsistently delivered. Comprehensive regional evidence on surgical outcomes is therefore limited.
Objective:
To determine visual outcomes in children who underwent cataract surgery with primary IOL implantation in SSA.
Main findings:
Eight studies were included qualitatively; seven (conducted in Kenya, Tanzania [n = 2], The Gambia, Nigeria, Zambia, South Africa and Ethiopia) contributed to meta-analysis. Study durations ranged from 12 to 58 months.
The proportion of eyes achieving a good visual outcome (definition varied across studies) ranged from 16.5 % to 62 %, with a pooled short-term estimate of 31 % (95 % CI 20 % to 42 %). Comparable studies from middle- and high-income countries reported 41 %–91 %.
Complications:
Methodology:
PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for primary studies (1990–2020) reporting outcomes of cataract surgery with primary IOL implantation in children aged 0–16 years in SSA. English-language articles or those with an English translation were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data and assessed quality using the JBI checklist; disagreements were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Random-effects meta-analysis pooled outcome proportions; heterogeneity was examined with the I² statistic, and subgroup analyses explored age and IOL type.
Applicability / external validity:
Outcomes in SSA are generally poorer than in wealthier settings, largely because of delayed presentation, limited follow-up and inadequate visual rehabilitation. Significant heterogeneity, short follow-up and missing data on amblyopia therapy and spectacle use restrict the generalisability of pooled estimates. Longer-term prospective studies are needed.
Geographic focus:
Included studies were carried out in Kenya, Tanzania, The Gambia, Nigeria, Zambia, South Africa, and Ethiopia.
Summary of quality assessment:
There is medium confidence in the review’s conclusion. Searches were comprehensive and inclusion criteria explicit; dual-reviewer screening and quality appraisal were employed, and meta-analysis was appropriate. Limitations include English-language restriction, absence of an excluded-studies list and no analysis stratified by risk of bias.
Publication Source:
Mhango PP, Zungu TL, Nkume HI, Musopole A, Mdala SY. The outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 2;13(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02607-z. PMID: 39095869; PMCID: PMC11295353.
Downloadable link