Glaucoma evidence gap map

An ophthalmologist examines someone's eyes using a fundus lens.

What this map shows

At Sightsavers, our evidence gap maps (EGMs) summarise, appraise and present evidence from systematic or literature reviews.

The glaucoma EGM summarises evidence from 194 reviews. Most reviews (84) address treatment of glaucoma, followed by risk or prevention of the condition (38). Of the remainder, 27 explore screening/early detection, 18 examine quality of health care services, 15 investigate epidemiology, six cover quality of life, five analyse cost-benefit/economic aspects, and one assesses the role of technology.

The map highlights notable gaps at the health systems level: no reviews were identified on access to glaucoma services, and technology remains markedly under-researched.

Regarding the strength of evidence, 132 reviews provide strong answers to their research questions, 34 are inconclusive, and 28 are weak. In methodological terms, 97 reviews are graded low quality, 62 medium quality, and 35 high quality.

How to read an evidence gap map


Read our how to guide

Read our how to guide

Are we missing a systematic review?

This evidence gap map was last updated in 2025.
Help us keep this gap map up to date by sending us an email: gapmap@sightsavers.org

Reference

Sightsavers (2025). Glaucoma Evidence Gap Map [online] Available at: https://research.sightsavers.org/evidence-gap-maps/glaucoma-gap-map/ [Add date accessed]

Our research is guided by our five year strategy

Our research approach