Sightsavers Logo
Research centre
  • Home
  • About us
  • Research approach
  • Research studies and publications
  • Evidence gap maps
Join in:
  • Join in: Facebook
  • Join in: Twitter
  • Join in: Instagram
  • Join in: LinkedIn
  • Join in: YouTube
  • Global
  • Close search bar
    Donate
    • Home
    • About us
    • Research approach
    • Research studies and publications
    • Evidence gap maps

    Does medical treatment of mild intra-ocular hypertension prevent glaucoma?

    Methodological quality of the review: Low confidence

    Author: Aguinaga Ontoso I, Guillen Grima F, Aguinaga Ontoso E, Fernandez Fernandez LR

    Geographical coverage: Not reported

    Sector: Glaucoma

    Sub-sector: Treatment

    Equity focus: None specified

    Review type: Effectiveness review

    Quantitative synthesis method: Meta-analysis

    Qualitative synthesis method: Not applicable

    Background: Glaucoma is a serious disease that may cause a decrease in peripheral vision as well as blindness. Treatment of extreme levels of high intra-ocular pressure (IOP) reduces the risk of glaucoma, but the effect of treatment of mild and moderate IOP to prevent the onset of glaucoma is unknown.

    Objectives: The objective of this review was to study the effect of treatment with timolol in patients with mild IOP in the prevention of glaucoma.

    Main findings: In the first phase, 13 studies were selected. In most of the studies, 53% used eyes as the study unit (masked 61.5% and controls 84.6%). Timolol was the drug most frequently used. The combined effect size of all the studies of the first step was –7.55% and the weighted effect size was –11.34%.

    The treatments in papers selected in the first step were not the same – some of the studies used timolol, others epinephrine, others a combination that included timolol. In the second phase, only five studies which used timolol have used randomisation were selected. The combined effect size was –6.25%, and the weighted effect size was –6.45%.

    The pooled effect was computed Z by two methods: adding Zs and adding weighted Zs. The Z obtained by adding Zs had a value of 2.31120 (p = 0.017 one tail). Using the method of adding weighted Zs a value of 2.4201 (p = 0.0082 one tail) was obtained. Based on these findings, authors concluded that results show that the treatment of patients with mild and moderate IOP with timolol may help to prevent the onset of glaucoma. In addition, authors noted that longer-term studies are required to provide a better understanding of the preventative effect of timolol.

    Methodology: The MEDLINE CD-ROM system in the library of the Universidad Pública de Navarra was used to search for keywords ‘glaucoma suspects’ or ‘glaucoma prevention’ from 1967 to 1995. Gray literatures were also searched for relevant articles, and abstracts of Ophthalmology Congress were also reviewed. The search was done in two phases.  Only studies to assess the effect of pharmacological treatment (non-surgical) in the prevention of glaucoma were used, and persons included in the study had an IOP lower than 30 mm Hg.

    Effect size was computed for all the selected papers using the formula ES = Pt – Pc where Pt and Pc are the proportions in the treatment and control groups. In the meta-analysis, papers which used randomisation – and in which there was not a big bias and in which timolol was used – were chosen. Combined-effect size estimations and weighted combined-effect estimation were computed, as well as the pooled Z by two methods: the Stouffer’s methods of adding Zs and adding weighted Zs. In order to determine if some publication bias existed, a graphic of effect size by number of studies was drawn.

    Applicability/external validity: No methods were used either to assess the applicability/external validity of the results or to discuss how generalizable the results are.

    Geographic: This study focuses on all countries, though it is not clear if results from low/middle-income settings were found. However, the findings can be applicable to all settings.

    Summary of quality assessment: Authors conducted a meta-analysis of the findings and appropriately reported inclusion/exclusion criteria used for study selection. However, this review had some important limitations. The authors did not avoid publication and language bias. Authors did not report methods used to select studies and to extract data of included studies, nor did they discuss the quality and risk of bias of included studies. Therefore, there is low confidence in the conclusions about the effects of this study.

    Publication source: Aguinaga Ontoso I, Guillen Grima F, Aguinaga Ontoso E, Fernandez Fernandez LR. Does medical treatment of mild intra-ocular hypertension prevent glaucoma? Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;13(1):19-23. Source
    Sightsavers Logo
    Research centre
    • Join in:
    • Join in: Facebook
    • Join in: X
    • Join in: Instagram
    • Join in: LinkedIn
    • Join in: YouTube

    Protecting sight, fighting disease and promoting equality for all

  • Accessibility
  • Sightsavers homepage
  • Our policies
  • Media centre
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Cookies and privacy Terms and conditions Modern slavery statement Safeguarding

    © 2025 by Sightsavers, Inc., Business Address for all correspondence: One Boston Place, Suite 2600, Boston, MA 02108.

    Our website uses cookies

    To make sure you have a great experience on our site, we’d like your consent to use cookies. These will collect anonymous statistics to personalise your experience.

    Manage preferences

    You have the option to enable non-essential cookies, which will help us enhance your experience and improve our website.

    Essential cookiesAlways on

    These enable our site to work correctly, for example by storing page settings. You can disable these by changing your browser settings, but some parts of our website will not work as expected.

    Analytics cookies

    To improve our website, we’d like to collect anonymous data about how you use the site, such as which pages you read, the device you’re using, and whether your visit includes a donation. This is completely anonymous, and is never used to profile individual visitors.

    Advertising cookies

    To raise awareness about our work, we’d like to show you Sightsavers adverts as you browse the web. By accepting these cookies, our advertising partners may use anonymous information to show you our adverts on other websites you visit. If you do not enable advertising cookies, you will still see adverts on other websites, but they may be less relevant to you. For info, see the Google Ads privacy policy.