Sightsavers Logo
Research centre
  • Home
  • About us
  • Research approach
  • Research studies and publications
  • Evidence gap maps
Join in:
  • Join in: Facebook
  • Join in: Twitter
  • Join in: Instagram
  • Join in: LinkedIn
  • Join in: YouTube
  • Global
  • Close search bar
    Donate
    • Home
    • About us
    • Research approach
    • Research studies and publications
    • Evidence gap maps

    How visual impairment evidence gap-maps are constructed

    These visual impairment evidence gap-maps (EGMs) have been developed  by a team of researchers from Sightsavers, the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group and the International Centre for Eye Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, drawing on the guidance and previous experiences of the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), which initiated the development of EGMs.

    The development of EGMs followed a standardised systematic process:

    • First, electronic databases were searched for all systematic and literature reviews published since 1993.
    • The retrieved abstracts of the reviews were screened against a pre-defined list of inclusion criteria and the relevance of evidence to low and middle income countries was assessed by eye care experts with significant experience in these settings. The methodological quality of the reviews was assessed using an adapted version of the SURE checklist. To ensure the process was fair and unbiased, two people independently appraised each review and a third reviewer arbitrated in the cases of disagreement.
    • The process resulted in a short document summarising the review, its findings and methodological quality. The appraisals and summaries were shared with the corresponding authors, who had an opportunity to provide feedback and respond to methodological queries.

    EGMs were produced by constructing matrices, where review focus areas are displayed along the x axis, and the strength of evidence is shown along the y axis. The bubbles in the matrix cells represent each systematic or literature review.  Clicking on a bubble will open up a summary page.

    The cells where no reviews are shown indicate the areas where more evidence is required and where future research efforts should be directed.

    Sightsavers Logo
    Research centre
    • Join in:
    • Join in: Facebook
    • Join in: X
    • Join in: Instagram
    • Join in: LinkedIn
    • Join in: YouTube

    Protecting sight, fighting disease and promoting equality for all

  • Accessibility
  • Sightsavers homepage
  • Our policies
  • Media centre
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Cookies and privacy Terms and conditions Modern slavery statement Safeguarding

    © 2025 Sightsavers. Registered charity numbers 207544 and SC038110

    Our website uses cookies

    To make sure you have a great experience on our site, we’d like your consent to use cookies. These will collect anonymous statistics to personalise your experience.

    Manage preferences

    You have the option to enable non-essential cookies, which will help us enhance your experience and improve our website.

    Essential cookiesAlways on

    These enable our site to work correctly, for example by storing page settings. You can disable these by changing your browser settings, but some parts of our website will not work as expected.

    Analytics cookies

    To improve our website, we’d like to collect anonymous data about how you use the site, such as which pages you read, the device you’re using, and whether your visit includes a donation. This is completely anonymous, and is never used to profile individual visitors.

    Advertising cookies

    To raise awareness about our work, we’d like to show you Sightsavers adverts as you browse the web. By accepting these cookies, our advertising partners may use anonymous information to show you our adverts on other websites you visit. If you do not enable advertising cookies, you will still see adverts on other websites, but they may be less relevant to you. For info, see the Google Ads privacy policy.